Comments on: (Possibly) Important Information https://www.kashflow.com/blog/possibly-important-information/ Accounting & Payroll | Free Trial - No Card Required‎ Thu, 30 May 2019 08:51:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: PBS Creative https://www.kashflow.com/blog/possibly-important-information/#comment-4791 Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:08:00 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=15683#comment-4791 Do you provide an SPF record to use as per : http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Common_mistakes#include

]]> By: Duane Jackson - Founder & CEO https://www.kashflow.com/blog/possibly-important-information/#comment-3463 Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:23:31 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=15683#comment-3463 We own that range, so it’s not a problem.
Although it does make the second entry superfluous.

]]> By: Paul https://www.kashflow.com/blog/possibly-important-information/#comment-3462 Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:14:08 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=15683#comment-3462 In reply to Paul.

To clarify myself a little, in every other address allow/deny config I have come across to date, specifying the network address will allow all addresses in that subnet.

If SagePay is the same, are we allowing addresses outside of your subnet and to all the addresses from 31.222.144.1 to 31.222.144.254?

]]> By: Paul https://www.kashflow.com/blog/possibly-important-information/#comment-3461 Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:40:01 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=15683#comment-3461 By using a 255.255.255.0 netmask, you have made the second address into the “network id” address for that subnet.

Not sure if that will cause any issues!

]]>