Comments on: Sage Bosses Divided over Future of SaaS https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/ Accounting & Payroll | Free Trial - No Card Requiredโ€Ž Wed, 29 May 2019 14:31:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Duncan Stockdill https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-2123 Fri, 22 May 2009 11:18:49 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-2123 Spot on Duane. Good luck to Sage buying 37s though… I imagine the philosophies of those two companies might be incompatible!

]]>
By: Matt https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-2122 Fri, 22 May 2009 06:38:34 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-2122 @Wilf Uh oh. Careful. Duane will release the flying monkeys to hunt you down.. it’s Kash_F_low! ๐Ÿ˜‰

]]>
By: Wilf https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-2121 Thu, 21 May 2009 18:45:08 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-2121 or buy KashFlow and rebrand to Sageflow ๐Ÿ™‚

]]>
By: Matt https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-2120 Thu, 21 May 2009 10:55:43 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-2120 I’m not surprised to hear that there appear to be conflicting opinions within Sage on SaaS – it’s something that we’ve debated heavily (albeit not in the accountancy sphere) – and we’re smaller than they are!

However, to me, it seems clear that SaaS is a popular business model, rapidly growing – and one which empowers ISVs to deliver significant benefits to their users. If we gain the further benefit that ‘big’ companies don’t want to join in.. well.. it’s their loss! ๐Ÿ˜‰

]]>
By: Graham Smith https://www.kashflow.com/blog/sage-divided-over-saas/#comment-2119 Thu, 21 May 2009 10:41:46 +0000 http://www.kashflow.com/?p=685#comment-2119 Whilst I agree on some points, I think that the Sage products have massive amounts to offer in terms of use that SaaS packages don’t have. I don’t quite understand why that can’t be transferred.

Anyway, Sage grow by acquisition, if they want to get into a market, they will buy a product that is their already (or nearly there) – get it to where they want it, and then re-brand

]]>